The title says it all.
Good is a strong word
idk, do you take a while to think about each move? that would make you very skillful in longer time controls, but easy to flag in shorter ones (:
You've also only played a few games for both of the time controls, so you probably still have some provisional action in your rating gain/loss.
You've also only played a few games for both of the time controls, so you probably still have some provisional action in your rating gain/loss.
@griffindabeast said in #2:
> Good is a strong word
Say average for Rapid and weak in blitz. That fine?
> Good is a strong word
Say average for Rapid and weak in blitz. That fine?
@EcstaticFork said in #3:
> idk, do you take a while to think about each move? that would make you very skillful in longer time controls, but easy to flag in shorter ones (:
>
> You've also only played a few games for both of the time controls, so you probably still have some provisional action in your rating gain/loss.
Yeah, you can say so. I like to play 15+10 time control tournaments in my district. Although my recent one wasn't so good. 29th out of 101
> idk, do you take a while to think about each move? that would make you very skillful in longer time controls, but easy to flag in shorter ones (:
>
> You've also only played a few games for both of the time controls, so you probably still have some provisional action in your rating gain/loss.
Yeah, you can say so. I like to play 15+10 time control tournaments in my district. Although my recent one wasn't so good. 29th out of 101
@RubberLuffy said in #5:
> Yeah, you can say so. I like to play 15+10 time control tournaments in my district. Although my recent one wasn't so good. 29th out of 100
Lol! that's actually very good in my standards :P
But like I said, your rating is somewhat provisional, so maybe play around 100 more games for both.
> Yeah, you can say so. I like to play 15+10 time control tournaments in my district. Although my recent one wasn't so good. 29th out of 100
Lol! that's actually very good in my standards :P
But like I said, your rating is somewhat provisional, so maybe play around 100 more games for both.
@EcstaticFork said in #6:
> Lol! that's actually very good in my standards :P
>
> But like I said, your rating is somewhat provisional, so maybe play around 100 more games for both.
Yeah I noticed that too. In some games 14+ in others 34+. LOL
> Lol! that's actually very good in my standards :P
>
> But like I said, your rating is somewhat provisional, so maybe play around 100 more games for both.
Yeah I noticed that too. In some games 14+ in others 34+. LOL
@EcstaticFork said in #6:
> Lol! that's actually very good in my standards :P
Nah, I have better. Best was 19 out of some 150.
> Lol! that's actually very good in my standards :P
Nah, I have better. Best was 19 out of some 150.
For the record, neither "29th out of 100" nor "19th out of 150" says much without an idea of your opponents' strength. That's why rating performance is usually used as a measure. It can be misleading, too, but it still gives you better idea than just the score or rank.
Playing chess with a slow and steady style is that chess coaches want to their students to achieve.
So, you are someone my coach would love to train.
Whereas, whenever I lose a game with time ending early, I get scolded =)))
so be proud of your advantage in patiently calculating each move.
If you want to improve your speed, try starting with quick puzzle solving on Puzzle Rush Chess.com or Puzzle Racer on Lichess. The more puzzles you solve, the more familiar you'll become with different patterns, thereby increasing your speed of calculation.
So, you are someone my coach would love to train.
Whereas, whenever I lose a game with time ending early, I get scolded =)))
so be proud of your advantage in patiently calculating each move.
If you want to improve your speed, try starting with quick puzzle solving on Puzzle Rush Chess.com or Puzzle Racer on Lichess. The more puzzles you solve, the more familiar you'll become with different patterns, thereby increasing your speed of calculation.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.