Cheaters are Out of Control Today. Is Lichess anti cheating team on vacation today?

Well speaking as a paranoid schizophrenic lol..............
Paranoia= perfect awareness
I'm perfectly aware I have a mental illness, I'm also perfectly aware their are 2 types of people and the struggle between good and evil is a real everyday struggle, you only need to look at the world right now to know we're not all human,(we're all human in some form), just those that are from the tree of knowledge, threw away the love of God ,so as for cheating you can come to your own conclusions as to what is or isn't going on depending on your point of view. Human with no mental health problems: no clue about any other world , human with mental health problems: what the hell is going on? People: we can do what the hell we like, no comeuppance.( Until the second cumming ha ha ha ha) xxx much love SimonBirch xxx

@TinyYellowGuava Public shaming is forbidden in lichess, even after the shamed one has been tagged as a cheater.

Nooo

@SimonBirch said in #12:
> Well speaking as a paranoid schizophrenic lol..............
> Paranoia= perfect awareness
> I'm perfectly aware I have a mental illness, I'm also perfectly aware their are 2 types of people and the struggle between good and evil is a real everyday struggle, you only need to look at the world right now to know we're not all human,(we're all human in some form), just those that are from the tree of knowledge, threw away the love of God ,so as for cheating you can come to your own conclusions as to what is or isn't going on depending on your point of view. Human with no mental health problems: no clue about any other world , human with mental health problems: what the hell is going on? People: we can do what the hell we like, no comeuppance.( Until the second cumming ha ha ha ha) xxx much love SimonBirch xxx

seen this twaddle enough times as well, except maybe the porn reference at the end

@Cedur216 said in #15:
> seen this twaddle enough times as well, except maybe the porn reference at the end

You either know or you don't @Cedur216 and that's only your dirty mind that it's a porn reference. Like I said I wouldn't wish schizophrenia on my worst enemy , God forbid you ever suffer with it , just wish you weren't so narrow minded and had some insight that just possibly , you don't know everything and it's not just your point of view that's right and everyone else's wrong. I'll say a prayer for you and hope you go through life blissfully unaware, and if you're one of 'them ' , I forgive you xxx SimonBirch xlovexlifexlaughter

@Toscani said in #17:
> Have you tried analyzing the games with a much lower rated engine? To see if the moves are still played.

A useless exercise in my opinion. I'm told that lower-level engines are programmed by analysing the position in full but then (sometimes) artificially selecting a weaker move than the best. The results will not give any information which is relevant for cheating detection.

> www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20220401-intuition-when-is-it-right-to-trust-your-gut-instincts

I would suggest that gut instincts can indeed be a pointer when detecting cheating, but we should never lose sight of that fact that they are very often wrong here. For example, the powerful emotions we feel when we lose a game will often interfere in whatever rationality our gut instincts may offer us.

A person should do their homework before reporting a player.
People use what every they think works for them: The Maia engine, the green dots, the network level, the time per move, the time controls, the browser extension that shows average and best wins of a player compared to your own.
chromewebstore.google.com/detail/lichess-custom-stats/ppolcdjceepccgcemodacgafjcoaemlh

Example:
chesspawn123 (2303) +5
Quote: 55.76% (278)
Avg Opponent: 1749.15
Best Win: 2135

Toscani (1505) +16
Quote: 45.28% (5736)
Avg Opponent: 1679.53
Best Win: 2173

All things add up and sooner or later our finger is used to block a player and report them.

PS: The subject title could have been better worded. I find it rude. I also see no need to fully quote a post, including posting a link twice in the same forum subject. One post had to be deleted, so I deleted mine, to reduce the clutter.

@Toscani said in #18:
> PS: [...] I also see no need to fully quote a post, including posting a link twice in the same forum subject. One post had to be deleted, so I deleted mine, to reduce the clutter.

Sorry if you don't like my style of quoting, but I do it when necessary to show which points I am responding to.